{"id":2971,"date":"2024-08-19T12:40:08","date_gmt":"2024-08-19T12:40:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/?p=2971"},"modified":"2024-08-19T12:40:08","modified_gmt":"2024-08-19T12:40:08","slug":"incalcarea-principiului-contradictorialitatii-nelegalitatea-hotararii-determinata-de-solutionarea-cauzei-in-baza-unei-exceptii-care-nu-a-fost-pusa-in-discutia-contradictorie-a-partilor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/incalcarea-principiului-contradictorialitatii-nelegalitatea-hotararii-determinata-de-solutionarea-cauzei-in-baza-unei-exceptii-care-nu-a-fost-pusa-in-discutia-contradictorie-a-partilor\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00cenc\u0103lcarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u021bii. Nelegalitatea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii determinat\u0103 de solu\u021bionarea cauzei \u00een baza unei excep\u021bii care nu a fost pus\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bia contradictorie a p\u0103r\u021bilor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 prin care instan\u021ba de judecat\u0103 solu\u021bioneaz\u0103 cauza \u00een baza unei excep\u021bii care nu a fost pus\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bia contradictorie a p\u0103r\u021bilor, este nelegal\u0103, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea fiind considerat\u0103 ca fiind pronun\u021bat\u0103 cu \u00eenc\u0103lcarea regulilor de procedur\u0103 a c\u0103ror nerespectare atrage sanc\u0163iunea nulit\u0103\u0163ii.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Spe\u021ba ipotetic\u0103: <\/strong>pronun\u021barea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u0219ti prin care instan\u021ba re\u021bine direct \u00een cuprinsul hot\u0103r\u00e2rii c\u0103 \u201eexist\u0103 o prematuritate a solicit\u0103rii formulate de c\u0103tre reclamant\u0103\u201d dispun\u00e2nd respingerea cererii de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 a pune \u00een discu\u021bia contradictorie a p\u0103r\u021bilor excep\u021bia prematurit\u0103\u021bii cererii de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">O hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 prin care se solu\u021bioneaz\u0103 o excep\u021bie care nu a fost pus\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bia contradictorie a p\u0103r\u021bilor este nelegal\u0103 din perspectiva \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii urm\u0103toarelor reguli de procedur\u0103 a c\u0103ror nerespectare atrage sanc\u0163iunea nulit\u0103\u0163ii, respectiv:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(i)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dispozi\u021biilor art. 245 \u0219i urm. din C. proc. civ. referitoare la invocarea excep\u021biilor \u0219i procedura de solu\u021bionare \u2013 \u00een exemplul ipotetic oferit mai sus, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere caracterele excep\u021biei prematurit\u0103\u021bii cererii de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103 \u0219i faptul c\u0103 prematuritatea cererii se invoc\u0103 \u00een mod obligatoriu pe cale de excep\u021bie, excep\u021bia prematurit\u0103\u021bii putea fi invocat\u0103 inclusiv de c\u0103tre instan\u021ba de judecat\u0103 din oficiu;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(ii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dispozi\u021biilor art. 14 din C. proc. civ. referitoare la principiul contradictorialit\u0103\u021bii \u2013 av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103 \u00ee\u0219i \u00eentemeiaz\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pe motive de fapt \u015fi de drept, care nu au fost supuse, \u00een prealabil, dezbaterii contradictorii a p\u0103r\u021bilor, \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care prematuritatea cererii de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103 a fost pentru prima dat\u0103 re\u021binut\u0103 de c\u0103tre prima instan\u021b\u0103, direct \u00een cuprinsul hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u0219ti;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(iii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dispozi\u021biilor art. 13 din C. proc. civ. referitoare la dreptul la ap\u0103rare \u2013 av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 p\u0103r\u0163ilor nu li se asigur\u0103 posibilitatea de a-\u0219i face ap\u0103r\u0103ri, de a-\u0219i prezenta sus\u0163inerile \u00een scris \u015fi oral cu privire la eventuala prematuritate a cererii de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(iv)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dispozi\u021biilor art. 400 din C. proc. civ. referitoare la repunerea pe rol \u00een cazul \u00een care \u00een timpul deliber\u0103rii, instan\u0163a g\u0103se\u015fte c\u0103 sunt necesare probe sau l\u0103muriri noi \u2013 av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103, \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care instan\u021ba de judecat\u0103 constata \u00een timpul deliber\u0103rii c\u0103 se impune invocarea excep\u021biei prematurit\u0103\u021bii cererii de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103, are obliga\u021bia de a dispune repunerea pe rol a cauzei, cu citarea p\u0103r\u0163ilor, invocarea din oficiu a excep\u021biei prematurit\u0103\u021bii cererii de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103 \u0219i dezbaterea \u00een contradictoriu a excep\u021biei astfel invocate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>\u00cen loc de concluzii: <\/strong>solu\u021bionarea cauzei \u00een baza unei excep\u021bii care nu a fost pus\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bia contradictorie a p\u0103r\u021bilor, reprezint\u0103 un viciu care afecteaz\u0103 legalitatea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri, o astfel de hot\u0103r\u00e2re put\u00e2nd fi atacat\u0103 \u0219i put\u00e2ndu-se solicita inclusiv trimiterea cauzei spre rejudecare \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care partea interesat\u0103 face dovada c\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea astfel pronun\u021bat\u0103 echivaleaz\u0103 cu o solu\u0163ionare a procesului f\u0103r\u0103 a intra \u00een judecata fondului.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 prin care instan\u021ba de judecat\u0103 solu\u021bioneaz\u0103 cauza \u00een baza unei excep\u021bii care nu a fost pus\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bia contradictorie a p\u0103r\u021bilor, este nelegal\u0103, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea fiind considerat\u0103 ca fiind pronun\u021bat\u0103 cu \u00eenc\u0103lcarea regulilor de&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2973,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2971"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2971"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2971\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2974,"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2971\/revisions\/2974"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2973"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gmcid.ro\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}